FACTS:
On December 30, 1995, respondent received from petitioner a notice requesting the former to open its private road, Neptune Street, to public vehicular traffic starting January 2, 1996. On the same day, respondent was apprised that the perimeter separating the subdivision from Kalayaan Avenue would be demolished.
Respondent instituted a petition for injunction against petitioner, praying for the issuance of a TRO and preliminary injunction enjoining the opening of Neptune Street and prohibiting the demolition of the perimeter wall.
On December 30, 1995, respondent received from petitioner a notice requesting the former to open its private road, Neptune Street, to public vehicular traffic starting January 2, 1996. On the same day, respondent was apprised that the perimeter separating the subdivision from Kalayaan Avenue would be demolished.
Respondent instituted a petition for injunction against petitioner, praying for the issuance of a TRO and preliminary injunction enjoining the opening of Neptune Street and prohibiting the demolition of the perimeter wall.
ISSUE:
WON MMDA has the authority to open Neptune Street to public traffic as an agent of the state endowed with police power.
WON MMDA has the authority to open Neptune Street to public traffic as an agent of the state endowed with police power.
HELD:
A ‘local government’ is a “political subdivision of a nation or state which is constituted by law and has substantial control of local affairs”. It is a “body politic and corporate” – one endowed with powers as a political subdivision of the National Government and as a corporate entity representing the inhabitants of its territory (LGC of 1991).
A ‘local government’ is a “political subdivision of a nation or state which is constituted by law and has substantial control of local affairs”. It is a “body politic and corporate” – one endowed with powers as a political subdivision of the National Government and as a corporate entity representing the inhabitants of its territory (LGC of 1991).
Our Congress delegated police power to the LGUs in Sec.16 of the LGC of 1991. It empowers the sangguniang panlalawigan,
panlungsod and bayan to “enact ordinances, approve resolutions
and appropriate funds for the general welfare of the [province, city or municipality]
and its inhabitants pursuant toSec.16 of the Code and in the proper exercise of the
[LGU's corporate powers] provided under the Code.”
There is no
syllable in RA 7924 that grants the MMDA police power, let alone legislative power. Unlike the legislative bodies of the LGUs, there is
no grant of authority in RA 7924 that allows the MMDA to enact ordinances and
regulations for the general welfare of the inhabitants of Metro Manila. The MMDA
is merely a “development authority” and not a political unit
of government since
it is neither an LGU or a public
corporation endowed with legislative power. The MMDA Chairman is not an elective official, but is merely appointed by the President
with the rank and privileges of a cabinet member. In sum, the MMDA has no power to enact ordinances
for the welfare of the community. It is the LGUs, acting through their respective legislative
councils, that possess
legislative power and police power. The Sangguniang Panlungsod of Makati City did not pass any
ordinance or resolution ordering the opening of Neptune Street, hence, its
proposed opening by the MMDA is illegal.
No comments:
Post a Comment